Just Another Batman Blog

  Thomas Blake, the Catman, was created by Bill Finger and Jim Mooney in 1963 for Detective Comics #311. His origin revolves around his costume. The cat costume is made from mystical cloth from Africa, gives him enhanced abilities, including possibly 9 lives, which he uses to commit high-end heists. This origin is much like many other pulp fiction characters from the same era, reliant on mysticism and magic from far away, under developed lands, and misunderstood, "uncivilized" cultures. This can kindly be described as colonized fiction, but harshly and truly described as racist.  Just like several other characters written in the 60s, Catman had a distinct cat theme, much like his older female counterpart  Catwoman  (duh). He even had a tiger as a pet. At first, Catman's capers (crazy themed crimes probably are best described as capers) revolve around cat-themed merchandise. Often Catwoman is wrongfully accused of Catman's crimes, and she retaliates.  Eventually ...

  I've said it before on this blog, and I'll say it again, good villains in fiction need good criminal motivations. Good Batman villains need to be more than obsessed with beating Batman. The idea of a villain plotting and scheming to take down Batman, like some Western gunslinger kid looking to out shoot the most notorious outlaw, is only really good and compelling maybe one time. We had that one time in Batman comics, it was called Knightfall . After Bane's storyarc, we didn't need to revisit a personal crusade to tear down and ruin Batman for no other reason than bragging rights. However, comicbook writers continued to do just that. We got Bane, followed by Hush . The Joker  has done it multiple times. This is getting out of hand.  Simon Hurt was created by Grant Morrison in 2008, based on an unnamed scientist character created by Sheldon Maldoff and Charles Paris for a one issue story in Batman #156 in 1963. His backstory is a bit of a crazy retcon, but stay with...

This villain could be seen as a deep cut. Unless you're a Batman fanboy junkie. Created in 1966, by Gardner Fox and Carmine Infantino, the Cluemaster, Arthur Brown, is really nothing more than a Riddler rip-off. In his debut in Detective Comics #351 , Arthur Brown is a former game show host who decides to commit crimes and leave clues to help the police for some reason. This is not technically the same modis operandi as the Riddler, as the clues are not in the form of riddles, but this is basically semantics. The Cluemaster's goal is to uncover the identity of Batman and Robin, somehow.  Obviously, he is caught and thrown in Blackgate Prison. There are a few other appearances where he joins various super villain teams, to no success. But in Detective Comics #647 Brown is released from Blackgate. This time around he performs heists without leaving clues behind. However, someone else does, which ruins the new crimes and narrowly puts him back in prison.  This run...

Originally a nemesis of the Green Arrow, Clock King was created in 1960 by Francis Herron and Lee Elias for World's Finest Comics #111. His real name is William Tockman, and is much like most of the themed villains of the 60s, obsessed with a singular gimmick instead of the ambitions that drive normal criminals.  Also, like many villains created in the same period, Clock King has gone through changes. Originally, he dressed like the costume below. Eventually his look was changed to the more realistic and grounded look above that fits better with a character obsessed with punctuality.   Not a very time honored look Tockman, or sometimes referred to by the alias Temple Fugate (latin for Time Flies), is very much like Mr. Freeze in that he commits crimes for money to help a sick sister. He uses an obsession over timing to plan and execute a bank heist. After that initial appearance, the Clock King becomes one of many joke villains, easily dispatched due mor...

Pulp fiction seems to have a villain motivation problem. Back when I wrote the first post for this blog, about the Joker , I included a quote from Ben Bova. He states, "in the real world there are no villains. No one actually sets out to do evil [. . .] There are no villains cackling and rubbing their hands in glee as they contemplate their evil deeds". Villainy, in pulp fiction, is just bad guys doing bad things for no other reason, presumably, than to be bad. Snidley Whiplash hasn't any reasons for tying women to traintracks, normal people don't do that. But, normal people do hatch plans like Iago to psychologically control others through gaslighting, manipulation, rumors, and drama. Real people do cheat and steal to amass wealth. There is no believability or realism to Snidley Whiplash's villainy, but sociopaths and white collar criminals do exist.   These characters, the Terrible Trio, are far more like Snidley Whiplash. Created in 1958 by Dave Wood a...

Phil Cho's commission Another in a list of stupid villains that could be cool and scary under the right writers, Killer Moth was created in 1951. Bill Finger, Dick Sprang, and Lew Schwartz created the character for Batman #63. Introduced as a common criminal already in prison, Killer Moth has no original identity. He sees Batman as a vigilante resource for the police, and upon release, decides to set himself up as an "anti-Batman", a resource for criminals. He becomes a grifter, and creates for himself the identity of Cameron Van Cleer, a wealthy businessman and philantropist. As an alter ego to his alter ego, he also becomes Killer Moth, a henchman for hire with a moth motif, complete with workable wings and a spiderman webslinger-esque cacoon gun. Now, the premise of a Batman for criminals, a gun for hire that anyone can call with a beeper, is a pretty cool idea. Later on, other mercenary/hitman characters get created, but Killer Moth had the idea first. However, ...

I have been reading through Tom King's recent Batman run. Like Snyder before him, King has been overhauling stale, silly aspects to Batman canon and recreating them into twisted horror shows. The recently completed War of Jokes and Riddles (spoilers ahead, I guess) revolved around a pretty innocuous character and his origins, and it was done in a way that you don't immediately see coming. King takes perhaps one of the stupidest Batman villains, The Kite Man, and turns him into a tragic victim of both the Joker and the Riddler . Before this reboot, however, Kite Man started out in Batman #133 (1960), created by Bill Finger and Dick Sprang. His real name is Charles Brown, an homage to Charlie Brown of the Peanuts, created by Charles Schultz, who had repeat issues with an infamous kite eating tree. Right out of the gate, Kiteman was fated to be a joke.  He had 7 or 8 appearances since 1960, none of them truly memorable. Two of them ended in his death. His appearances ...